How it works

One caseload, followed from the post tray to a drafted letter

Eight capabilities that cover a typical day at a solicitors' firm — each one built around the same rule: the AI prepares, a person decides.

Step 1 · Incoming post

Reads the post and files it — with a person's sign-off

The problem: post sits in a tray for days because nobody has twenty free minutes to file it.

A scanned-mail folder per staff member is watched automatically. Every new scan is OCR'd, matched against the firm's client list, and given a plain-English summary. Staff see a preview of the document with the AI's best guess at the right client and case file already ticked.

What the person does: one click to confirm, or use the search box right there if the AI got it wrong. Once confirmed, the document uploads to the right case file, gets renamed to something readable — document type, client name, reference number, not IMG_0047.pdf — and is available in the case management system within moments.
Step 2 · Deadline-risk prevention

Keeps a running checklist of what a complete file should contain — and what's due

The problem: a checklist gap, or a limitation date, gets found the week of a hearing — not the week the file opened.

For each practice area — personal injury, probate, conveyancing, medical negligence, disability/Assessment of Need claims, and family law — Lexicore knows what documents should exist in a complete file, tracks statutory and limitation dates against it, and flags what's missing or coming due.

Where a human comes in: confidence scoring means genuinely ambiguous cases route to a person rather than triggering a wrong automated guess. See the checklist for your practice area on the Practice Areas page.
Step 3 · Questions, answered from the file

Answers questions about a case — grounded in that case's actual documents

The problem: an hour lost re-reading a file for one sentence you know is in there somewhere.

"What date was the accident reported to the Gardaí?" is answered from the client's real extracted documents, with a citation, not a generic AI guess. The same engine works firm-wide against indexed Irish Acts, Law Society precedents and practice notes for compliance-review citations.

Why it matters: every answer points back to the passage it came from, so a solicitor can check it in seconds rather than taking it on faith.
Step 4 · Compliance review

Reviews a document — or a whole matter — section by section

The problem: a full pre-hearing review means an afternoon nobody has free.

Lexicore walks a document section by section and returns a verdict — Compliant, Concern or Not applicable — with an explanation and a citation back to the relevant source material.

At scale: it can run across every document in a matter as a background job — the kind of pre-hearing or file-closure check that would otherwise mean an afternoon of manual review, done overnight and waiting in the morning.
Step 5 · Drafting

Drafts letters and notes in your firm's own style

The problem: the same letter written from scratch, again, at 6pm.

Lexicore learns a firm's own document templates — stripping sensitive client data first — and drafts letters, attendance notes and other documents in that firm's actual house style. Not a generic AI voice dropped into a template.

Still a draft: every document goes to the fee-earner for review before it's sent. The AI does the first pass; the solicitor's name is still the one on the letter.
Step 6 · The daily agenda

Gives every solicitor a daily AI-generated agenda

The problem: the morning gets lost deciding what actually needs doing today.

A "today" view groups the day's actionable items by client, with full case context pre-loaded, so a solicitor can ask questions, dictate using local speech-to-text — never cloud-based — apply a template, and resolve the item without hunting through the case file first.

Resolving an item: send an email or mark it done, right from the agenda — with the AI having already done the reading.
Step 7 · Conflict screening

Screens for conflicts of interest before a new matter opens

The problem: a conflict check that depends on someone remembering a name from three years ago.

Fuzzy name-matching against both existing clients and known contacts — opposing solicitors, insurers, experts — flagged as Strong, Possible or Weak.

Important boundary: this is a screening aid, not a legal determination. It surfaces what a person should look at — it doesn't replace a proper conflict check.
Step 8 · One-off documents

Auto-fills forms and handles documents that aren't part of a case yet

The problem: a one-off document with nowhere to go and no time to deal with it properly.

A standalone assistant for files that haven't been attached to a matter — auto-fills PDF forms, answers a question about a document, fills in gaps, or produces a tightened-up rewrite, without needing to file it anywhere first.

Use case: a quick second opinion on a one-off document, or getting a form ready before it's clear which file it belongs to.

Every one of these steps ends with a person

That's deliberate — see how the trust model works on the Security & Privacy page.

Request a Demo
Tell Us What's Slowing You Down